Executive Summary

IFRS 9 and expected loss provisioning

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and other accounting standard setters set out principles-based standards on how entities should recognise and provide for credit losses for financial statement reporting purposes. In July 2014, the IASB issued International Financial Reporting Standard 9. Financial Instruments (IFRS 9), which introduced an “expected credit loss” (ECL) framework for the recognition of impairment. This Executive Summary provides an overview of the ECL framework under IFRS 9 and its impact on the regulatory treatment of accounting provisions in the Basel capital framework.

What’s different about impairment recognition under IFRS 9?

Effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018, IFRS 9 sets out how an entity should classify and measure financial assets and financial liabilities. Its scope includes the recognition of impairment. In the standard that preceded IFRS 9, the “incurred loss” framework required entity’s to recognise credit losses only when evidence of a loss was apparent. Under IFRS 9’s ECL impairment framework, entities are required to recognise ECLs at all times, taking into account past events, current conditions and forecast information, and to update the amount of ECLs recognised at each reporting date to reflect changes in an asset’s credit risk. It is a more forward-looking approach than its predecessor and will result in more timely recognition of credit losses.

Expected credit loss framework – scope of application

Under IFRS 9, financial assets are classified according to the business model for managing them and their cash flow characteristics. In essence, if
(a) a financial asset is a simple debt instrument such as a loan,
(b) the objective of the business model in which it is held is to collect its contractual cash flows (and generally not to sell the asset) and
(c) those contractual cash flows represent solely payments of principal and interest, then the financial asset is held at amortised cost.
The ECL framework is applied to those assets and any others that are subject to IFRS 9’s impairment accounting, a group that includes lease receivables, loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts. For the sake of simplicity, the remainder of this Summary will focus on the ECL framework as it applies to loans.

Three stages of impairment

Impairment of loans is recognised – on an individual or collective basis – in three stages under IFRS 9:

Stage 1 – When a loan is originated or purchased, ECLs resulting from default events that are possible within the next 12 months are recognised (12-month ECL) and a loss allowance is established. On subsequent reporting dates, 12-month ECL also applies to existing loans with no significant increase in credit risk since their initial recognition. Interest revenue is calculated on the loan’s gross carrying amount (that is, without deduction for ECLs).
In determining whether a significant increase in credit risk has occurred since initial recognition, an entity is to assess the change, if any, in the risk of default over the expected life of the loan (that is, the change in the probability of default, as opposed to the amount of ECLs).

Stage 2 – If a loan’s credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition and is not considered low, lifetime ECLs are recognised. The calculation of interest revenue is the same as for Stage 1.

Stage 3 – If the loan’s credit risk increases to the point where it is considered credit-impaired, interest revenue is calculated based on the loan’s amortised cost (that is, the gross carrying amount less the loss allowance). Lifetime ECLs are recognised, as in Stage 2.

Twelve-month versus lifetime expected credit losses

ECLs reflect management’s expectations of shortfalls in the collection of contractual cash flows.

Twelve-month ECL is the portion of lifetime ECLs associated with the possibility of a loan defaulting in the next 12 months. It is not the expected cash shortfalls over the next 12 months but the effect of the entire credit loss on a loan over its lifetime, weighted by the probability that this loss will occur in the next 12 months. It is also not the credit losses on loans that are forecast to actually default in the next 12 months. If an entity can identify such loans or a portfolio of such loans that are expected to have increased significantly in credit risk since initial recognition, lifetime ECLs are recognised.

Lifetime ECLs are an expected present value measure of losses that arise if a borrower defaults on its obligation throughout the life of the loan. They are the weighted average credit losses with the probability of default as the weight. Because ECLs also factor in the timing of payments, a credit loss (or cash shortfall) arises even if the entity expects to be paid in full but later than when contractually due.

Disclosure

Entity subject to IFRS 9 are required to disclose information that explains the basis for their ECL calculations and how they measure ECLs and assess changes in credit risk. They must also provide a reconciliation of the opening and closing ECL amounts and carrying values of the associated assets separately for different categories of ECL (for example, 12-month and lifetime loss amounts) and by asset class.

IFRS 9 amends the requirements of IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures, introducing a number of new disclosures relating to classification and measurement, impairment and hedge accounting

The classification and measurement disclosures include a requirement to analyse gains and losses resulting from the derecognition of financial assets measured at amortised cost. The purpose of these disclosures is to highlight the degree to which, and reasons why, amortised cost assets are derecognised before maturity, in light of the business model objective for those assets being held to collect. IAS 1 is also amended to require a line item in the income statement for gains and losses arising from the derecognition of financial assets measured at amortised cost.
The credit risk disclosures require information about credit risk management practices and credit risk exposures. In addition, extensive qualitative and quantitative information about amounts arising from, and changes in, expected credit losses is required. This includes detailed reconciliations of the loss allowance by class. The disclosures are designed to allow users to understand the application and effect of the IFRS 9 impairment model, including information about the judgements made when applying the model.
The hedge accounting disclosures are also extensive and also apply to those entities that, upon adopting IFRS 9, elect to continue to apply the hedge accounting requirements of IAS 39. The disclosures require information about an entity’s risk management strategy and its effect on future cash flows. Detailed disclosures about the effect hedge accounting has had on the primary financial statements is also required.

Regulatory treatment of accounting provisions

The timely recognition of, and provision for, credit losses promote safe and sound systems and play an important role in supervision. Since Basel I, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) has recognised that there is a close relationship between capital and provisions. This is reflected in the regulatory treatment of accounting provisions under the Basel capital framework.

In October 2016, the BCBS released for public comment a consultative document and a discussion paper on the policy considerations related to the regulatory treatment of accounting provisions under the Basel capital framework, in light of the shift to ECL by both the IASB and US Financial Accounting Standards Board. Given the diversity of accounting and supervisory policies in respect of provisioning and capital across jurisdictions, coupled with uncertainty about the capital effects of the change to an ECL accounting framework, the BCBS decided to retain – for an interim period – the current regulatory treatment of provisions as applied under both the standardised approach and internal ratings-based approaches. The BCBS will consider the longer-term regulatory capital treatment of provisions further, including undertaking analysis based on quantitative impact assessments.

The BCBS has also set out optional transitional arrangements for the impact of ECL accounting on regulatory capital and the corresponding Pillar 3 disclosure requirements should individual jurisdictions choose to implement such transitional arrangements.

This Executive Summary are also available in Mgi Alekim LLP website.

Should you have any questions regarding the information in this executive summary, please do not hesitate to contact Ezekiel Mulandi